CSARS v Drs Mkhabele and Indunah Diagnostic Radiologists Inc and Others (2024/036576)

Companies Act, 2008

The urgency of the application diminishes due to delays in its launch. The Business Practitioner is not implementing a rejected business plan, and no apparent harm exists since the Practitioner is acting lawfully by paying creditors of a business under rescue. As a result, urgent relief is unnecessary. Preliminary objections citing non-compliance with sections 133(1) and 145(1)(a) of the Companies Act are dismissed. The application arose from miscommunication, which could have been resolved, making it appropriate for each party to bear its own costs.